What are the top 5 items most restaurants should track daily?
Usually - top protein, second protein, cheese, cooking oil, and a top-product item (or any ingredient that drives cost and variance in your concept).
How Often Should You Calculate Food Cost?
Importance of Food Cost Frequency
Most restaurant owners already know the basic food cost formula. The difference between a restaurant that knows food cost and a restaurant that controls food cost is how quickly the numbers turn into decisions. Frequency matters because food cost problems rarely show up as one dramatic event. They usually build quietly- a cook starts "eyeballing" portions, prep yield drops because trimming is inconsistent, a receiver stops checking invoices against deliveries, or a popular item gets rung up wrong in the POS so sales look lower than they actually are. If you only calculate food cost once a month, those small issues can stack for weeks before you even realize there's a leak.
Think of food cost calculations like a dashboard. A monthly calculation is a "rearview mirror" view - it's valuable for accounting and trend analysis, but it's late for operational correction. Weekly food cost is closer to a steering wheel- it gives you enough accuracy to trust the number, and enough speed to fix problems before they repeat. Daily tracking can be even faster, but only if it's focused on the right signals. Daily full food cost isn't realistic for most operations, but daily visibility on key items (proteins, high-dollar ingredients, high-theft items, or top sellers) can help you catch issues immediately.
The right frequency is really about decision speed vs. effort. More frequent tracking gives faster feedback, but it requires stronger habits - consistent counting, clean invoice capture, correct POS categories, and stable recipes/portions. If those fundamentals aren't in place, daily or even weekly numbers can become noisy - and noisy numbers lead to bad decisions.
The Core Calculations
No matter whether you track food cost daily, weekly, or monthly, the math is built on the same foundation. What changes is the level of precision and the effort required to produce the number. If you understand the core calculations and what can throw them off, you'll be able to pick the right cadence and trust what you're seeing.
The starting point is Actual Food Cost (COGS) -
Beginning Inventory + Purchases - Ending Inventory = Actual Food Cost
This tells you what your kitchen used during a period. From there, most owners convert it into a percentage, because percentages are easier to compare across weeks or seasons -
Food Cost % = (Actual Food Cost / Food Sales) x 100
The key is that the time period must match. If your purchases cover Monday-Sunday but your sales report is Tuesday-Monday, you're going to create a fake variance that looks like a problem. Same goes for late invoices, missing credits, or inventory counts done at different times of day.
Once you're comfortable with actual food cost, the next level is Theoretical Food Cost - what you should have spent based on recipes and what you sold. Many restaurants compare theoretical vs. actual to spot operational leaks -
Theoretical - recipe cost x quantity sold (based on POS mix)
Actual - the inventory and purchasing reality
When actual is consistently higher than theoretical, it often points to issues like over-portioning, waste, comps/voids not tracked, incorrect recipes, inaccurate yields, theft, or receiving errors.
To make these calculations meaningful at any frequency, a few non-math basics have to stay consistent -
- Inventory counts are standardized (same units, same method, same areas counted)
- Purchases are captured correctly (all invoices in the right period, credits applied)
- Sales categories are clean (food sales vs. beverage sales, correct menu mapping)
- Recipes and yields are realistic (trim/cook loss accounted for, portions defined)
If these foundations are messy, calculating food cost more often doesn't solve the problem - it just produces confusion faster. But when they're dialed in, even a simple weekly calculation becomes a powerful control tool.
Daily Food Cost
Daily food cost sounds like the ultimate level of control - but for most restaurants, a true daily food cost calculation is unrealistic. A full calculation requires accurate beginning and ending inventory for the day, complete invoice capture, and tight sales mapping. Counting every item daily is expensive in labor and disruptive to operations. That said, daily food cost can be incredibly useful when you redefine what "daily" means - not a full inventory-based COGS calculation, but daily cost visibility through targeted signals.
Daily tracking makes the most sense if your operation has one or more of these realities - high volume, thin margins, frequent promotions, volatile ingredient pricing (especially proteins), a large prep program with yield risk, or recurring issues with waste and portioning. In those environments, waiting a full week to spot a problem can be costly. Daily checks help you answer questions like - Did yesterday's chicken usage match sales? Did we spike in waste? Are we over-prepping? Are comps and voids higher than normal? Did we receive a delivery incorrectly?
A practical daily approach usually includes -
- Tracking top 10 high-cost items (proteins, cheese, cooking oil, key produce) by usage
- A simple waste log (what, why, estimated value)
- Comps/voids/discounts reviewed with managers (because they can distort food cost %)
- A quick look at sales mix changes (one promo item can shift overall cost)
The advantage is speed- you can tighten portions today, adjust par levels tomorrow, and correct ordering before the next delivery. The downside is that daily numbers can be noisy if your systems aren't clean -especially if invoices land late, transfers aren't recorded, or sales categories are messy. The best way to use daily tracking is as an early warning system, not a final score. If a daily signal looks off, you investigate - then confirm the trend with your weekly inventory-based calculation.
Weekly Food Cost
For most restaurant owners, weekly food cost is the best balance of accuracy and effort. It's frequent enough to catch problems before they become expensive habits, but not so frequent that your team spends more time counting than running service. Weekly also lines up naturally with how restaurants operate - ordering cycles, delivery schedules, staffing patterns, and manager routines tend to repeat every 7 days. That makes the results easier to interpret and act on.
A strong weekly food cost process usually starts with one decision - pick a consistent "food cost week." Many operators run Monday-Sunday or Tuesday-Monday, depending on when inventory counting is easiest. The important part is consistency and matching the period across inventory counts, purchases, and sales. When those three align, your weekly number becomes a reliable operational KPI, not just an accounting report.
Weekly food cost works especially well because it helps you detect the most common "leaks" while they're still small -
- Portion drift (a little extra protein per plate adds up fast)
- Prep overproduction leading to spoilage
- Receiving issues (short deliveries, wrong products, price changes)
- Incorrect POS buttons or category mapping
- Untracked staff meals, promos, or comps
- Theft and uncontrolled access (especially with high-value items)
A practical weekly routine doesn't stop at calculating the percentage. It includes a short review and action plan. After you calculate COGS and food cost %, compare it to your target and to the prior 4 weeks. If it's up, don't panic - diagnose. Did a vendor price jump? Did sales mix shift toward higher-cost items? Were there events, catering orders, or a promo that changed volume? Then look at the controllables - waste, portioning, yields, and receiving.
To keep weekly food cost manageable, many restaurants use a hybrid counting method - full counts for high-dollar items weekly, and a rotating cycle count for lower-risk items. The goal is to create a weekly cadence your team can execute consistently. When you do that, weekly food cost becomes your best steering wheel metric - fast enough to correct course, accurate enough to trust, and simple enough to maintain long-term.
Monthly Food Cost
Monthly food cost is the most common rhythm in traditional bookkeeping, and it's still important - especially for financial statements, tax reporting, lender packages, and understanding long-term trends. Because invoices have time to arrive, credits are more likely to be applied, and accounting can reconcile categories cleanly, monthly numbers often look "neater" than weekly snapshots. But "neater" doesn't always mean "better" for running the day-to-day business.
The biggest drawback is speed. If you only calculate food cost once per month, you're accepting that any operational issue can run for weeks before you catch it. Over-portioning, inconsistent prep yields, sloppy receiving, or a spike in waste can quietly drain margin all month. By the time you see the damage, it's harder to pinpoint the cause because too many things changed over four or five weeks - menu mix, staffing, vendor prices, events, seasonality, and more. Monthly food cost is a rearview mirror - it tells you what happened, but often too late to prevent it.
Monthly is also where "timing distortions" can hide. If you stock up heavily at the end of the month, your purchases might be high while your ending inventory is also high - so your COGS could look normal even if your ordering wasn't disciplined. On the flip side, if you run inventory down right before month-end, you can make food cost look artificially low, then get hit the next month when you restock. That's why some owners feel like their food cost is "random" month to month - it's not random, it's timing.
So when is monthly acceptable as your primary cadence? Typically when your operation is stable and controlled - consistent recipes and portioning, strong receiving habits, secure storage, low waste, and predictable sales. Even then, monthly should be treated as the close-out and validation step, not the only checkpoint. The best use of monthly food cost is to reconcile and confirm the bigger picture - then use weekly (and sometimes daily signals) to manage the behaviors that actually drive the number.
Transform Your Restaurant Operations Now!
Effortless Inventory Tracking with Altametrics!
How to Choose the Right Frequency
Choosing how often to calculate food cost isn't about copying what another restaurant does - it's about matching the cadence to your risk level and your ability to execute consistently. A perfect daily system that never gets done is worse than a solid weekly system that happens every single week. Start by thinking in two categories - (1) how quickly problems can appear in your operation, and (2) how quickly your team can produce reliable numbers.
Daily (signals) + weekly (full calculation) tends to fit restaurants with higher risk or faster-moving variables, such as -
- High sales volume and tight margins (small mistakes become big money fast)
- Heavy reliance on volatile inputs (proteins, cooking oil, dairy)
- Fast-changing menu mix (promos, limited-time offers, catering)
- Large prep programs (yield and spoilage risk)
- Multiple managers or inconsistent execution across shifts
In these cases, daily tracking doesn't mean counting the whole restaurant. It means watching the biggest cost drivers and behaviors so you can react immediately, then confirming trends with weekly COGS.
Weekly works for the majority of independents and many multi-unit managers because it hits the "sweet spot." If you do one consistent weekly inventory count (even if it's partial with a cycle-count strategy), match it with purchases and sales for the same period, and review variances, you'll catch issues while they're still fixable. Weekly is especially effective if your ordering cycle is weekly, since it lets you adjust pars and purchasing before the next order.
Monthly-only should be the exception, not the default - unless your restaurant is extremely stable and controlled. Monthly can work if your menu is consistent, your storage is secure, your recipes/portions are locked in, and your managers already track waste and key item usage. Otherwise, monthly-only typically leads to late discovery and vague explanations like "it must be the vendor prices," even when the real issue is operational.
A simple way to decide is to ask - How much would it hurt to be wrong for 30 days? If the answer is "a lot," you need weekly at minimum and daily signals for your highest-risk items. If your operation is calm and controlled, weekly plus a monthly reconciliation may be enough. The right frequency is the one you can do consistently - and use to take action, not just produce reports.
Implementation Checklist and Common Pitfalls
The best food cost cadence is the one your team can execute consistently. To make daily/weekly/monthly tracking actually work, you need a simple setup that removes guesswork and prevents the most common distortions. Use this checklist to implement your system and keep the numbers trustworthy.
Implementation checklist (set it up once, then run it weekly)
1. Pick your period and lock it in - Decide your food cost week (ex. MondaySunday) and always count on the same day/time.
2. Standardize inventory units - Count in the same units every time (lbs, cases, number each). Create a consistent count sheet by storage area.
3. Assign owners - One person counts each area (walk-in, freezer, dry storage, line) so the method stays consistent.
4. Define what counts as "food sales" - Make sure your sales report matches your food cost calculation (exclude alcohol if you're not including beverage inventory).
5. Capture purchases correctly - Collect all invoices in the correct period, including credits and returns. If you transfer product between locations, record it.
6. Lock recipes and portions - Update recipe cards with realistic yields (trim loss, cook loss) and use portion tools (scales, scoops, ladles).
7. Add daily signals (optional but powerful) - Track top cost items, waste, and comps/voids so you can investigate issues before the weekly count.
Common pitfalls (and how to avoid them)
1. Mismatched timeframes - Inventory counts, purchases, and sales must cover the same dates - or your food cost will be "wrong" even if operations are fine.
2. Inconsistent counting methods - Switching units (cases vs. pounds) or "eyeballing" partials creates noise and fake variance.
4. Missing invoices or late credits - One missing delivery invoice can make a week look artificially low, then the next week looks inflated.
5. POS mapping errors - If items ring under the wrong category or buttons don't match recipes, theoretical comparisons and % calculations become misleading.
6. Ignoring yield and prep loss - High-cost proteins and produce must reflect trim/cook loss, or plate costs will be understated.
7. Chasing the percentage without context - Promos and sales mix can raise food cost % even when you're operating well - always review item mix and volume.
If you build a consistent process and avoid these traps, food cost stops being a mystery. It becomes a control system - one that tells you what to fix, when to fix it, and whether your actions are working.
Streamline Your Inventory. Order Smartly.
Start Simplifying Your Orders with Altametrics
Must-Read Content